The Supreme Court has set aside the order of the Customs and Excise
Appellate Tribunal upholding the levy of duty and penalty for the import
of furnace oil by Uniworth Textiles Ltd. The company had argued that
the demand was delayed and therefore not valid. The tribunal reasoned
that since the company procured furnace oil not for its own captive
plant but for a sister concern, it could not claim exemption from
payment of duty. The Supreme Court stated that the tribunal was wrong
and its conclusion that non- payment was equivalent to collusion or
willful misstatement was untenable. It rejected the revenue authorities
contention that the act of the company was willful and mala fide. It is a
serious allegation requiring high order of credibility and the
authorities have not discharged this burden of proof.
No comments:
Post a Comment